The Influence of the Novel Computer-Aided Triage System Based on Artificial Intelligence on Endovascular Therapy in Patients with Large Vascular Occlusions: A Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) with modern healthcare has become increasingly prominent. The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of the novel computer-aided triage system based on artificial intelligence (AI-CTS) on endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with large vascular occlusions (LVO). This study marks the first comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis on the subject. METHODS: A comprehensive study was performed on PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Chinese databases from their establishment to September 2023, in accordance with PRISMA recommendations. RevMan 5.4 software was used for summative analysis. The outcomes included door-to-groin (DTG) time, time from CT scan initiation to EVT, time from CT scan to reperfusion, and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS). RESULTS: A total of 7 studies involving 752 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that patients in the post-AI group had less time of DTG [SMD, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.40-0.69; P < 0.00001] and CT scan to EVT [SMD, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.42-0.73; P < 0.00001], as well as less time of CTA to recanalization [SMD, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.36-0.90; P < 0.00001]. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of the mRS at 90 days [OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.43-1.01; P = 0.06]. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of AI-CTS and EVT has improved the therapy process for LVO patients. However, the improvement in mRS at 90 days was not significant; further research is warranted.

Anatomical Study of Cross-Transfer of the Contralateral C7 Nerve Through the Posterior Epidural Pathway of the Cervical Spine for the Treatment of Spastic Paralysis of the Upper Limbs.

BACKGROUND: This study explored the safety and feasibility of surgical treatment of spastic paralysis of the central upper extremity by contralateral cervical 7 nerve transfer via the posterior epidural pathway of the cervical spine. METHODS: Five fresh head and neck anatomical specimens were employed to simulate contralateral cervical 7 nerve transfer through the posterior epidural pathway of the cervical spine. The relevant anatomical landmarks and surrounding anatomical relationships were observed under a microscope, and the relevant anatomical data were measured and analysed. RESULTS: The posterior cervical incision revealed the cervical 6 and 7 laminae, and lateral exploration revealed the cervical 7 nerve. The length of the cervical 7 nerve outside the intervertebral foramen was measured to be 6.4 ± 0.5 cm. The cervical 6 and cervical 7 laminae were opened with a milling cutter. The cervical 7 nerve was extracted from the inner mouth of the intervertebral foramen, and its length was 7.8 ± 0.3 cm. The shortest distance of the cervical 7 nerve transfer via the posterior epidural pathway of the cervical spine was 3.3 ± 0.3 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-transfer surgery of the contralateral cervical 7 nerve via the posterior epidural pathway of the cervical spine can effectively avoid the risk of nerve and blood vessel damage in anterior cervical nerve 7 transfer surgery; the nerve transfer distance is short, and nerve transplantation is not required. This approach may become a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of central upper limb spastic paralysis.

The effect of general anesthesia and conscious sedation in endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and trial sequential analysis.

Objectives: General anesthesia (GA) and conscious sedation (CS) are common methods for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, the risks and benefits of each strategy are unclear. This study aimed to summarize the latest RCTs and compare the postoperative effects of the two methods on EVT patients. Materials and methods: We systematically searched the database for GA and CS in AIS patients during EVT. The retrieval time was from the creation of the database until March 2023. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Random-effects or fixed-effects meta-analyses were used to assess all outcomes. Results: We preliminarily identified 304 studies, of which 8 were included. Based on the pooled estimates, there were no significant differences between the GA group and the CS group in terms of good functional outcomes (mRS0-2) and mortality rate at 3 months (RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.95-1.24, p = 0.23) (RR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.75-1.22, p = 0.70) as well as in NHISS at 24 h after treatment (SMD = -0.01, 95% CI: -0.13 to 0.11, p = 0.89). However, the GA group had better outcomes in terms of achieving successful recanalization of the blood vessel (RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.07-1.19, p < 0.0001). The RR value for the risk of hypotension was 1.87 (95% CI: 1.42-2.47, p < 0.00001); for pneumonia, RR was 1.43 (95% CI: 1.07-1.90, p = 0.01); and for symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, RR was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.74-1.26, p = 0.68). The pooled RR value for complications after intervention was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.87-1.22, p = 0.76). Conclusion: In patients undergoing EVT for AIS, GA, and CS are associated with similar rates of functional independence. Further trials of a larger scale are needed to confirm these findings.

Contralateral seventh cervical nerve transfer for central spastic arm paralysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objectives: The specific benefits of a contralateral cervical 7 nerve transplant in people with spastic paralysis of the upper extremity caused by cerebral nerve injury are unclear. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of contralateral C7 nerve transfer for central spastic paralysis of the upper extremity, we conducted a comprehensive literature search and meta-analysis. Materials and methods: PRISMA guidelines were used to search the databases for papers comparing the efficacy of contralateral cervical 7 nerve transfer vs. rehabilitation treatment from January 2010 to August 2022. The finishing indications were expressed using SMD ± mean. A meta-analysis was used to assess the recovery of motor function in the paralyzed upper extremity. Results: The meta-analysis included three publications. One of the publications offers information about RCTs and non-RCTs. A total of 384 paralyzed patients were included, including 192 who underwent CC7 transfer and 192 who received rehabilitation. Results from all patients were combined and revealed that patients who had CC7 transfer may have regained greater motor function in the Fugl-Meyer score (SMD 3.52, 95% CI = 3.19-3.84, p < 0.00001) and had superior improvement in range of motion compared to the rehabilitation group (SMD 2.88, 95% CI = 2.47-3.29, p < 0.00001). In addition, the spasticity in the paralyzed upper extremity significantly improved in patients with CC7 transfer (SMD -1.42, 95% CI = -1.60 to -1.25, p < 0.00001). Conclusion: Our findings suggested that a contralateral C7 nerve transfer, which has no additional adverse effects on the healthy upper limb, is a preferable method to restore motor function.